An Instructor's Diagnostic Aid for Feedback in Training.

Autor/inn/en	Andrews, Dee H.; Uliano, Kevin C.
Titel	An Instructor's Diagnostic Aid for Feedback in Training.
Quelle	(1985), (40 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Adult Education; Diagnostic Teaching; Educational Diagnosis; Educational Needs; Error Patterns; Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Methods; Feedback; Instructional Improvement; Material Development; Military Personnel; Military Training; Models; Needs Assessment; Postsecondary Education; Research Needs; Student Evaluation; Systems Approach; Teacher Education; Team Teaching + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Diagnostic assessment; Diagnostisches Verfahren; Pedagogical diagnostics; Pädagogische Diagnostik; Educational need; Bildungsbedarf; Fehlertyp; Unterrichtsqualität; Lehrmaterialentwicklung; Militärausbildung; Analogiemodell; Bedarfsermittlung; Post-secondary education; Tertiäre Bildung; Forschungsbedarf; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Systemischer Ansatz; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Teamteaching
Abstract	The time constraints facing most Navy instructors often preclude their providing feedback concerning poor performance of trainees in various military training programs that takes into account such psychological considerations as contiguity, repetition, reinforcement, or consideration of a learner's internal conditions of learning. The Instructor's Diagnostic Aid for Feedback in Training (IDAFT) has been proposed as one possible solution to this problem. Major steps in the IDAFT process include introduction to the program, performance measurement (either objective or subjective), error analysis, determination of major sources and types of error, identification of categories of training deficiency, determination of causes of error and events of instruction that were not properly addressed, development of a general feedback prescription from IDAFT, modification of the general prescription for specific application, and presentation of the feedback prescription to the training team. The model has been field tested with actual team instructors involved in antisubmarine warfare training teams. This trial has shown that it takes an instructor who is familiar with the system from three to five minutes to work through an IDAFT prescription. Plans are being formulated to assess the effectiveness of the IDAFT system and to determine whether it is the best method for providing feedback aids in naval team-training situations. (MN)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC